Ian J. Rhile, Todd F. Markle, Hirotaka Nagao, Antonio G. DiPasquale, Oanh P. Lam, Mark A. Lockwood, Katrina Rotter, James M. Mayer
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY 128(18) 6075-6088 2006年5月 査読有り
Three phenols with pendant, hydrogen-bonded bases (HOAr-B) have been oxidized in MeCN with various one-electron oxidants. The bases are a primary amine (-CPh2NH2), an imidazole, and a pyridine. The product of chemical and quasi-reversible electrochemical oxidations in each case is the phenoxyl radical in which the phenolic proton has transferred to the base, (OAr)-O-center dot-BH+, a proton-coupled electron transfer (PCET) process. The redox potentials for these oxidations are lower than for other phenols, predominately from the driving force for proton movement. One-electron oxidation of the phenols occurs by a concerted proton-electron transfer ( CPET) mechanism, based on thermochemical arguments, isotope effects, and Delta Delta G(double dagger)/Delta Delta G degrees. The data rule out stepwise paths involving initial electron transfer to form the phenol radical cations [center dot+HOAr-B] or initial proton transfer to give the zwitterions [-OAr-BH+]. The rate constant for heterogeneous electron transfer from HOAr-NH2 to a platinum electrode has been derived from electrochemical measurements. For oxidations of HOAr-NH2, the dependence of the solution rate constants on driving force, on temperature, and on the nature of the oxidant, and the correspondence between the homogeneous and heterogeneous rate constants, are all consistent with the application of adiabatic Marcus theory. The CPET reorganization energies, lambda = 23-56 kcal mol(-1), are large in comparison with those for electron transfer reactions of aromatic compounds. The reactions are not highly non-adiabatic, based on minimum values of H-rp derived from the temperature dependence of the rate constants. These are among the first detailed analyses of CPET reactions where the proton and electron move to different sites.