Curriculum Vitaes

Agata Kapturkiewicz

  (カプツルキェヴィッチ アガタ)

Profile Information

Affiliation
Assistant Professor (tenure track), Faculty of Economics Department of Management, Sophia University
Degree
DPhil in Management(University of Oxford)
MPhil in Modern Japanese Studies with Distinction(University of Oxford)

Researcher number
90906132
ORCID ID
 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5864-0452
J-GLOBAL ID
202101019586468240
researchmap Member ID
R000020508

Papers

 9
  • Martin Hemmert, Ying Cheng, Adam Cross, Agata Kapturkiewicz, Jae-Jin Kim, Masahiro Kotosaka, Franz Waldenberger
    Academy of Management Proceedings, 2024(1), Aug, 2024  Peer-reviewed
  • Heli Helanummi-Cole, Agata Kapturkiewicz
    Proceedings of the 40th EGOS Colloquium. European Group for Organizational Studies (EGOS): Milan, Italy, Jul, 2024  Peer-reviewed
  • Agata Kapturkiewicz, Heli Helanummi-Cole
    Entrepreneurial Ecosystems in Cities and Regions: Emergence, Evolution, and Future. R. Huggins, F. Kitagawa, D. Prokop, C. Theodoraki, & P. Thompson (Eds.). Oxford University Press, 404-421, Mar 14, 2024  Peer-reviewedInvitedLead author
    <jats:title>Abstract</jats:title> <jats:p>One of the challenges in existing research on entrepreneurial ecosystems (EEs) is that it can strongly emphasize either the structure aspect of the EEs or agency—especially that of entrepreneurs. These emphases can sometimes make it difficult to untangle the mechanisms of how various EE actors interact with and co-create their EEs, and understand how such mechanisms might vary across locations and bring about different types of entrepreneurial and socio-economic outcomes. In this chapter, we follow in the footsteps of several pioneering EE studies using the theoretical lens of organizational fields (e.g. Thompson et al., 2018; Auschra et al., 2019). We elaborate on how the focus on fields’ institutional infrastructure (Hinings et al., 2017) can be a useful analytical tool to examine the link between EE actors’ agency and EE elements and structures. Our discussion highlights how the institutional infrastructure concept can help researchers to uncover key EE mechanisms, their variations, and diverse outcomes. We illustrate our conceptual propositions with case vignettes from comparative contexts of Japan, India, and Finland, which are based on in-depth empirical studies conducted by the authors of this chapter. The vignettes from these diverse contexts, coupled with insights from relevant past literature on organizational fields and EEs, highlight a spectrum of possible modes of engagement—and outcomes of such engagement—of EE actors with their EEs’ institutional infrastructure. Overall, this chapter offers a contribution to how researchers can better understand EE processes by using the theoretical lens of organizational fields—especially the institutional infrastructure concept.</jats:p>
  • Agata Kapturkiewicz
    The Association of Japanese Business Studies Conference Proceedings, 35th Annual AJBS Meeting Warsaw, Poland, 18, Jul, 2023  Peer-reviewedLead author
  • Agata Kapturkiewicz
    Research Policy, 51(9) 104377-104377, Oct, 2022  Peer-reviewedLead author

Books and Other Publications

 2

Presentations

 35

Teaching Experience

 18

Research Projects

 7

Other

 4