Curriculum Vitaes
Profile Information
- Affiliation
- Faculty of Law, Sophia University
- Degree
- Master of Arts in Law(Mar, 2015, Sophia University)Doctor of Philosophy in Law(Mar, 2022, Sophia University)
- J-GLOBAL ID
- 202201003891595212
- researchmap Member ID
- R000034682
Research Interests
6Research Areas
2Research History
9-
Apr, 2024 - Present
-
Apr, 2024 - Present
-
Apr, 2023 - Present
-
Apr, 2022 - Present
-
Apr, 2022 - Mar, 2024
Education
3-
Apr, 2015 - Mar, 2022
-
Apr, 2013 - Mar, 2015
-
Apr, 2009 - Mar, 2013
Papers
7-
『イギリス哲学研究』, (47) 115-118, Mar, 2024 Invited
-
Annals of Ethics, 69 191-204, Mar, 2020 Peer-reviewedIt could be said that universalizability is an accepted and plausible thesis for moral discourse. It claims that value-judgments are valid only if they are universalizable. One would not fail to notice that it was R. M. Hare who, in line with Kant, built a unique theory upon the idea of universalizability. Hare presented this thesis not as a substantial claim in normative ethics, but as one based on ‘logic,’ which is counted as an innovation in the history of ethics. Nevertheless, Hare’s argument for this thesis is said to contain a difficulty. According to traditional interpretations, Hare’s second major work Freedom and Reason(FR)left a logical leap. Hare in FR, they say, claims value-judgments are universalizable because value-words have descriptive meaning. However, the trivial fact of descriptive meaning does not logically entail such normative requirements which the universalizability thesis implies. This paper will argue that these traditional interpretations overlook the continuity in Hare’s ethics, namely between his first major work Language of Morals( LM)and FR. The argument for normative requirements of value-judgments in FR presupposes the argument for universalizability in LM. In LM, Hare did argue value-judgments are felicitous only if done in a universalizable manner, for making value-judgments is a form of speech act, i. e. ‘decision of principle.’ Given this, one will easily understand why universalizability as felicity necessarily involve the normative requirements of value-judgements. Put in another way, one will not be able to understand the argument in FR without understanding the one in LM. Hare submitted the universalizability thesis as a ‘logical’ thesis, and the word ‘logic’ here has a wider connotation, which includes internal rules of practice in which we all are engaged. And this indicates Hare’s philosophical insight that why and how we should universalize our value-judgements can only be grasped from the point of view which we have as participants of normative practice.
Major Books and Other Publications
1Presentations
7-
デレク・パーフィット研究会, May 31, 2025, 東京法哲学研究会 Invited「デレク・パーフィット研究会」登壇者:森村進、森村たまき、杉本俊介、冨田絢矢。
-
合評会『道徳はなぜ価値判断の問題になるのか』@創価大学, Jul 13, 2024, 蝶名林亮 Invited評 者:伊勢田哲治(京都大学)、佐藤岳詩(専修大学)
Teaching Experience
6-
Apr, 2024 - PresentApplied Ethics (Waseda University)
-
Apr, 2024 - PresentPhilosophy of Mind (Soka University)
-
Apr, 2023 - PresentIntroduction to Philosophy (Soka University)
-
Apr, 2022 - PresentEthics (Kyoei University)
-
Apr, 2022 - Mar, 2023Social Studies (Tokyo Gakugei University)
