Sugitani Yoko

Introduction This study provides initial evidence that grammatical structure in language can shape cognitive preferences for sequential visual stimuli. Linguists classify languages as head-initial or head-final based on their syntactic headedness. Building on this typology, we propose two cognitive styles: head-initial or “zoom-out” cognition, which tends to process more specific, detailed information before focusing on broader perspectives, and head-final or “zoom-in” cognition, which focuses on information from comprehensive to specific. We hypothesized that people's cognitive styles (zoom-in vs. zoom-out) are contingent on their language type (zoom-in or zoom-out language), which determines their cognitive preferences for the order of sequential visual stimuli. Methods We conducted three experiments ( N = 823) involving speakers of zoom-in and zoom-out languages to test our hypotheses using a single sequential visual item and questionnaire-based assessments of processing fluency. This design allowed us to isolate the cognitive effect while acknowledging limits on generalizability. Results Across studies, speakers of zoom-in (zoom-out) languages tended to experience higher processing fluency and more favorable evaluations when sequential visual stimuli were presented in a zoom-in (zoom-out) style. Discussion These findings offer preliminary evidence linking language structure to visual cognition and highlight opportunities for future research on cross-linguistic variation in cognitive style.

Abstract As a countermeasure to the increased loneliness induced by the COVID‐19 pandemic‐related university closures, universities provided students with online interaction opportunities. However, whether these opportunities contributed to reducing loneliness during the university closures remains unclear, as previous studies have produced contradictory findings. We conducted a nationwide cross‐sectional survey. Data were collected on demographics, social environment, social support, interactions, health and loneliness from 4949 students from 60 universities across Japan. We used psychological network and Directed Acyclic Graphs (DAGs) to examine the effect of online interactions on loneliness during university closures during COVID‐19. The results showed that the frequency of online interactions with friends did not exert a significant influence on loneliness during university closures. A comparative examination of the DAGs further illuminated that the social environment exhibited fewer pathways for interpersonal interactions and social support during these closure periods. The psychosocial pathways influencing young adults' loneliness show variations contingent on the university's closure status. Notably, the impact of heightened online interactions with friends on loneliness appears to be less pronounced among young adults in the context of university closure.